Original English No Icc 01 04 02 06-Books Pdf

Original English No ICC 01 04 02 06
17 Jan 2020 | 37 views | 0 downloads | 12 Pages | 504.78 KB

Share Pdf : Original English No Icc 01 04 02 06

Download and Preview : Original English No Icc 01 04 02 06

Report CopyRight/DMCA Form For : Original English No Icc 01 04 02 06



Transcription

ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 2 12 EO T, Document to be notified in accordance with regulation 31 of the Regulations of the. The Office of the Prosecutor Counsel for the Defence. Ms Fatou Bensouda Me St phane Bourgon, Mr James Stewart Me Christopher Gosnell. Ms Nicole Samson, Legal Representatives of Victims Legal Representatives of Applicants. Ms Sarah Pellet, Mr Dmytro Suprun, Unrepresented Victims Unrepresented Applicants. Participation Reparation, The Office of Public Counsel for The Office of Public Counsel for the.
Victims Defence, States Representatives Amicus Curiae. Registrar Counsel Support Section, Mr Herman von Hebel. Victims and Witnesses Unit Detention Section, Mr Nigel Verrill. Victims Participation and Reparations, No ICC 01 04 02 06 2 12 16 May 2017. ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 3 12 EO T, Further to the submission of the Request on behalf of Mr Ntaganda for an order.
precluding the use during the Defence case of Mr Ntaganda s non privileged. telephone conversations from the Detention Centre on 25 April 20171 Defence. Request the Prosecution s response to the Defence motion to supress non. privileged Detention Centre telephone conversations submitted on 8 May 20172. Prosecution Response the Request for leave to reply to the Prosecution s. response to the Defence motion to supress non privileged Detention Centre. telephone conversations filed on 11 May 20173 Defence Request Seeking Leave to. Reply and Trial Chamber VI Chamber s order communicated via electronic. correspondence on 12 May 2017 granting in part the Defence Request Seeking Leave. to Reply Counsel representing Mr Ntaganda hereby submit this. Reply on behalf of Mr Ntaganda to the Prosecution s response to the Request on. behalf of Mr Ntaganda for an order precluding the use during the Defence case of. Mr Ntaganda s non privileged telephone conversations from the Detention. Defence Reply, INTRODUCTION, 1 Pursuant to the Chamber s authorization the Defence hereby replies to the. Prosecution Response in relation to issues 3 5 and 6 identified in the Defence. Request Seeking Leave to Reply, 1 ICC 01 04 02 06 1878. 2 ICC 01 04 02 06 1893, 3 ICC 01 04 02 06 1901, No ICC 01 04 02 06 3 12 16 May 2017. ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 4 12 EO T, SUBMISSIONS. I Third Issue, 2 Contrary to the Prosecution s assertion at paragraph 21 the Defence Request is.
not urging the Chamber to ignore clear Appeals Chamber jurisprudence. Indeed the Prosecution s assertion fails to consider that the facts of this case. are clearly distinguishable from the situation addressed in the Ngudjolo. Appeals Judgement 4, 3 The Ngudjolo Appeals Judgement denied the Prosecution s third ground of. appeal which comprised three sub grounds In essence the Appeals Chamber. held that the decision rendered by Trial Chamber II acquitting Mr Ngudjolo. was not materially affected by the fact that the Prosecution was not authorized. to use Registry Reports related to Mr Ngudjolo s non privileged conversations. from the ICC Detention center to cross examine witnesses. 4 In its first sub ground the Prosecution argued that Trial Chamber II erred by. preventing the Prosecutor from getting access to Mr Ngudjolo s recorded. conversations Whereas Trial Chamber II indeed denied the Prosecutor s. requests to gain access to the full recorded conversations of Mr Ngudjolo on. two occasions it is noteworthy that the Appeals Chamber found on appeal. from judgement Prosecutor s second disclosure request that Trial Chamber II. had not erred by denying the Prosecutor full access to Mr Ngudjolo s recorded. conversations The Appeals Chamber noted that the Trial Chamber refrained. from providing full access to the recorded conversations on the basis that such. information fell within the purview of article 8 of the European Convention on. Human Rights or the right to mount a defence which could only be. 4 Ngudjolo Appeals Judgement ICC 01 04 02 12 271, No ICC 01 04 02 06 4 12 16 May 2017. ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 5 12 EO T, interfered with in accordance with the law and if necessary and. proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued 5, 5 The significance of this holding when considering the Prosecution s second. sub ground in relation to which the Appeals Chamber held that Trial Chamber. II erred by denying the Prosecutor the opportunity to use the Registry Reports in. the trial to cross examine Mr Ngudjolo and witness D03 88 is paramount. 6 Indeed the Appeals Chamber did not hold that the Prosecutor should have. been allowed to use Mr Ngudjolo s conversations to cross examine him and. another witness but rather that it should have been allowed to use redacted. Registry Reports from which personal information and information concerning. his defence strategy was redacted The Appeals Chamber held that the. appeals Chamber notes in this context that the Registry Reports as mentioned. above had previously been screened as regards content and information. considered to relate to Mr Ngudjolo s private life or his defence strategy was. withheld from the Prosecutor and consequently could not have been used. during cross examination 6, 7 What is more the Prosecution in the Ngudjolo trial was seeking to use the.
Registry Reports for a limited number of witnesses Mr Ngudjolo himself and. Prosecution Witness P 250 for the purpose of i assessing the credibility of. inter alia Mr Ngudjolo ii to cross examine Mr Ngudjolo on his statement. reflected in the recorded conversations concerning Mr Katanga s possible. participation in the attack on Bogoro and iii to prove that witness D03 88 was. in collusion with Mr Ngudjolo and was biased 7, 5 Ngudjolo Appeals Judgement ICC 01 04 02 12 271 paras 267 268. 6 Ngudjolo Appeals Judgement para 276, 7 Ngudjolo Appeals Judgement para 271. No ICC 01 04 02 06 5 12 16 May 2017, ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 6 12 EO T. 8 The situation in this case considering inter alia i the fact that the. Conversations sought to be used were obtained unfiltered without any. restrictions ii the fact that the Conversations sought to be used comprise both. personal information as well as information concerning Mr Ntaganda s. defence iii the number of witnesses for whom the Prosecution intends to use. Mr Ntaganda s non privileged conversations from the Detention Center. Conversations iv the fact that the Prosecution team in this case has had. access to such information is prejudicial to the accused as it places the. Prosecution in an unduly advantageous position vis vis the Defence 8 and. v the Chamber s order deciding that as an alternative measure to ensure the. fair and expeditious conduct of the proceedings the Chamber decides that the. Prosecution shall not be allowed to use the material obtained in the context of. the Article 70 proceedings during the Defence s presentation of evidence unless. specifically authorized by the Chamber as necessary for the determination of. the truth pursuant to its duty under article 69 3 of the Statute upon receipt of. a substantiated request to be filed sufficiently in advance of the intended use 9. is entirely different, 9 It simply cannot be said that the Appeals Chamber would have adopted the. same ruling in respect of the situation in this case In fact facing a similar. situation the Appeals Chamber would in all likelihood affirm a ruling. precluding the Prosecution from using both the Conversations as well as the. Registry Reports during the cross examination of either Mr Ntaganda or other. Defence witnesses, II Fifth Issue, 10 The 8 May 2017 Prosecution Response referring to the 28 April 2017 Chamber s.
Decision on Defence request for stay of proceedings with prejudice to the. 8 Decision Denying Stay ICC 01 04 02 06 1883 para 42. 9 Decision Denying Stay para 61, No ICC 01 04 02 06 6 12 16 May 2017. ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 7 12 EO T, Prosecution 10 Chamber Decision Denying Stay clearly displays the. material relationship between the Prosecution Response and the Chamber. Decision Denying Stay, 11 First the Prosecution making it clear that it intends to use Mr Ntaganda s. Conversations to cross examine no less than twenty Defence witnesses while. not seeking leave to appeal the Chamber Decision Denying Stay establishes. beyond doubt the Prosecutor s view that the Chamber Decision Denying Stay. introduces no more than a mere additional procedural step i e the. Prosecution having to submit a substantiated request sufficiently in advance. leading to the use of the Conversations, 12 This is significant if only because the aim of the measure imposed by the. Chamber as stated in the Chamber Decision Denying Stay is to ensure the fair. and expeditious conduct of the proceedings as a result of the prejudice to Mr. Ntaganda caused by the Prosecution having had access to information. including information on the whereabouts of the accused and other individuals. at the relevant times names of individuals who could have provided for the. Defence and potential witnesses and which may therefore be relevant to. Defence strategy11 placing the Prosecution in an unduly advantageous. position vis vis the Defence, 13 Evidently the alternative remedy ordered in the Chamber Decision Denying.
Stay is disproportionate in relation to the prejudice intended to be cured. Leaving open the possibility for the Prosecution to use the Registry Reports. concerning Mr Ntganda s Conversations as well as the possibility for the. 10ICC 01 04 02 06 1883, 11The Defence recalls its submission in its Request Seeking Leave to Appeal ICC 01 04 02 06 1888. paragraph 32 that the Chamber failed to take important Defence submissions into consideration. namely that in the Conversations Mr Ntaganda provided or received indications as to information. that he considered useful in countering allegations made by the Prosecution and explained how such. information could be obtained and indicated flaws in the Prosecution s theory. No ICC 01 04 02 06 7 12 16 May 2017, ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 8 12 EO T. Prosecution to use the Conversations as necessary for the determination of the. truth pursuant to its duty under article 69 3 without any additional guidance. the Chamber Decision Denying Stay clearly does not go far enough Hence the. Defence Request, 14 Taking into consideration the Prosecution s statement repeated on more than. one occasion that it has accessed records of Mr Ntaganda s non privileged. communications solely with the purpose of protecting the witnesses in this case. and investigating alleged violations of article 70 of the Statute in conjunction. with the failure of the Prosecution to provide any concrete information. concerning its intended use of the Conversations to cross examine Mr. Ntaganda or Defence witnesses it stems from the Chamber Decision Denying. Stay that it is plainly insufficient to ensure the fair and expeditious conduct of. the proceedings, 15 In fact the Prosecution s stated aim to use the Conversations to cross examine. at least twenty Defence witnesses regardless of the procedure put in place. demonstrates the Prosecution s intent to support its broad allegations of. coaching of Defence witnesses which in turn would seriously impact both the. fairness and the expeditious conduct of the proceedings. 16 In light of the above the Defence Request is certainly neither overbroad nor. premature The Chamber must adjudicate the Defence Request at this time. stopping the Prosecution in its tracks by ordering that there be no use by the. Prosecution of Mr Ntaganda s Conversations or Registry Reports related to the. same during the presentation of the case for the Defence. III Sixth Issue, 17 Further to the Prosecution s disclosure of the recordings of Mr Ntaganda s.
Conversations towards the end of the presentation of its case leaving aside for. No ICC 01 04 02 06 8 12 16 May 2017, ICC 01 04 02 06 1908 16 05 2017 9 12 EO T. the moment the resulting prejudice to the Accused caused by inter alia i the. Prosecution having knowingly obtained all of Mr Ntaganda s Conversations. comprising detailed confidential Defence information and ii the Prosecution. having presented most of its case while being in the possession of confidential. Defence information without informing the Defence the Defence argued that. the right of Mr Ntaganda to have adequate time and facilities for the. preparation of his defence justified an extension of time to review and analyze. the Conversations The Defence submitted a number of related requests. 18 Despite having expressed the view that the Conversations were important for. the Defence for various reasons including for the selection of Defence. witnesses the Prosecution systematically opposed all Defence requests to have. the time necessary to complete this task, 19 Even though the Defence managed to obtain additional resources from the. Registry for the purpose of securing the services of additional team members to. review the Conversations all Defence requests for additional time were denied. by the Chamber, 20 As a result the Defence has been unable to review all of the Conversations. before the dates set by the Chamber for the submission of the Defence further. provisional list of witnesses and Defence final list of witnesses Regardless. even though the Defence argued that it was not in a position to select Defence. No ICC 01 04 02 06 3 12 16 May 2017 Further to the submission of the Request on behalf of Mr Ntaganda for an order precluding the use during the Defence case of Mr Ntagandas non privileged

Related Books

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO UNIRIO

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ESTADO DO RIO DE JANEIRO UNIRIO

EPI Ergonomia ABSTRACT Biosafety in Librarianship one approach to conservation of collections professionals and users in libraries The conservation of collections in libraries is a common issue among professionals and researchers interesting at the preservation of the informational content present The most of jobs directs your attention only to the collections leaving questions like

Dartanian da Silva Marmitt Marcelo Wunsch FAHOR

Dartanian da Silva Marmitt Marcelo Wunsch FAHOR

validado a partir das etapas informacional conceitual e detalhado O desenvolvimento do projeto do dispositivo para aplica o do torque possibilitou atingir os objetivos propostos Palavras chave Dispositivo Desenvolvimento de projeto Requisitos de clientes projeto ABSTRACT The demand increase of planters production motivated the choice of the subject of this monograph which

aula2 tecnicas de projeto Modo de Compatibilidade

aula2 tecnicas de projeto Modo de Compatibilidade

Projeto Informacional O usu rio como parceiro no projeto Ogliari 1999 T CNICAS DE PROJETO Aula 02 Notas de aula PROJETO MEC NICO SEM 0347 FORTULAN CA 2017 S o Carlos Projeto Informacional GERA O DO CONCEITO Depto de Marketing Fontes internas Fontes externas An lise das necessidades dos consumidores Pesquisa de Mercado Sugest es do pessoal de contato com os clientes

Universidade de Bras lia

Universidade de Bras lia

Inova es Tecnol gicas e Organizacionais e a Influ ncia das Novas Exig ncias do Trabalho em Escrit rios na Qualidade de Vida no Trabalho Romildo Garcia Brusiquese Disserta o apresentada ao Programa de P s Gradua o em Psicologia Social do Trabalho e das Organiza es como requisito parcial obten o do grau de Mestre em Psicologia Social do Trabalho e das Organiza es

02 Productividad y Competitividad MDP

02 Productividad y Competitividad MDP

US 2 070 de PBI por habitante 20 clientes atendidos por vendedor en el d a 1 250 kg de trigo por HP de potencia utilizada 30 000 ton km por cami n d a Stock Productividad 150 de producto por 100 de recursos utilizados Total 150 de producto por 100 de recursos utilizados Valorizada La productividad aumenta en 8 paquetes por hora hombre si aumenta un 10 la velocidad de la

7 Refer ncias Bibliogr ficas

7 Refer ncias Bibliogr ficas

US Pearson Education Inc 2002 BASTIEN J M C amp SCAPIN D L Ergonomic criteria for the evaluation of Ergonomia informacional compreensibilidade de s mbolos para sinaliza o de hospitais p blicos e unidades de sa de no Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro PUC 2002 FORTY Adrian Objeto de Desejo design e sociedade desde 1750 S o Paulo Cosac Naify 2007 PUC Rio

REVIS O BIBLIOGR FICA SOBRE A SINERGIA ENTRE PRODUCTION E

REVIS O BIBLIOGR FICA SOBRE A SINERGIA ENTRE PRODUCTION E

Com a Revolu o Tecnol gica e a Revolu o Informacional e as novas tecnologias da informa o redesenharam sistemas de produ o de modo que a informa o fluxo cr tico O objectivo dos sistemas de produ o produzir produtos bens e ou servi os no m nimo tempo poss vel ao menor custo e com a melhor qualidade O processo de convers o de produ o de mat rias primas em

UM ESTUDO INTERCULTURAL DOS SIMBOLOS DO GHS SISTEMA

UM ESTUDO INTERCULTURAL DOS SIMBOLOS DO GHS SISTEMA

A PARTIR DA ERGONOMIA INFORMACIONAL Aluna Fernanda Assis Orientador Claudia Mont Alv o Introdu o Segundo para o Minist rio do Desenvolvimento Industria e Comercio Exterior BRASIL 2010 nenhum pa s tem a capacidade de identificar e regular detalhadamente o risco de cada produto qu mico Por exemplo nos Estados Unidos a estimativa que existam 650 000 desses produtos A

PROJETO DE SINALIZA O COM ENFOQUE EM METODOLOGIAS

PROJETO DE SINALIZA O COM ENFOQUE EM METODOLOGIAS

Ergonomia informacional projeto de sinaliza o disciplina de comunica o visual Este artigo visa apresentar o desenvolvimento de projetos de sistemas sinaliza o em ambiente constru do em disciplina do curso de Comunica o Visual Design Trata se da aplica o de conceitos de ergonomia informacional e metodologia de ergodesign Apresentam se as etapas do desenvolvimento e o

Your Secret Wealth Amazon S3

Your Secret Wealth Amazon S3

Secret Wealth he added one more step to the selling process and increased the pulling power of all his activities And the results and profits 800 He made so much more money in the first year he tried it that he was able to take his entire company to Hawaii for three weeks on vacation to celebrate My wish for you in this program is that I can get you to start thinking and living in

Guide to buying and selling websites Amazon Web Services

Guide to buying and selling websites Amazon Web Services

Guide to buying and selling websites from my personal experiences In this guide I will walk you through my real life process using real life examples To date I have purchased over 10 websites and sold 5 companies which were web properties This post is based on my experience in doing so Below I am going to take you through a deal that happened a couple months ago The facts are real The